Functional Physical Training: Enhancing Performance and Health Through Integrated Movement Patterns
PDF

Keywords

functional training
physical performance
; muscular endurance
evidence-based exercise
integrated biomechanics
motor patterns
proprioception
neuromuscular control
exercise prescription

How to Cite

Trimboli, G. (2026). Functional Physical Training: Enhancing Performance and Health Through Integrated Movement Patterns. Journal of Advanced Health Care, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.36017/jahc202683596

Abstract

The paper is a systematic literature review examining the scientific evidence for functional physical training (FPT) — an approach based on multi-joint, multi-planar movements that replicate real-life and sport motor patterns, as opposed to traditional machine-based isolation exercises.

Methods: 45 studies were selected from 150 initial citations (PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, SPORTDiscus, CINAHL, Cochrane Library; 2000–2023), following PRISMA guidelines. Methodological quality was assessed via the PEDro scale (mean score 5.8/10, indicating moderate-to-good quality). Due to high heterogeneity, formal meta-analysis was not performed; a structured narrative synthesis was used instead.

Key findings across six outcome domains:

  • Sprint speed: ~5% improvement over 100 m in athletes (vs. 2% in controls)
  • Balance: 20% greater improvement in older adults compared to traditional exercise, with significant clinical implications for fall prevention
  • Body composition: ~3% reduction in fat mass and ~4% increase in lean mass in sedentary overweight adults over 12 weeks
  • Agility: ~15% improvement on standardised tests (T-test, Illinois) in football players
  • Muscular strength: ~10% increase in deadlift strength from kettlebell-based protocols, with good transfer to functionally relevant tasks
  • Muscular endurance: Superior improvements (35% in push-ups, 48% in plank time) compared to traditional resistance training

Limitations acknowledged: variable definition of "functional training" across studies; heterogeneous comparator groups; short follow-up periods (mostly 8–12 weeks); limited data on long-term adherence, adverse events, and non-Western populations.

Conclusions: The evidence supports FPT as an effective and versatile modality for athletes, older adults, and general populations. The authors call for higher-quality RCTs with longer follow-up, mechanistic studies, and implementation research for public health translation.

https://doi.org/10.36017/jahc202683596
PDF
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2026 Giovanni Trimboli